Berghuis v. Smith: Continuing Ambiguity in Fair-Cross-Section Claims


Journal article


Natalie A Pifer
Loy. LAL Rev., vol. 44, HeinOnline, 2010, p. 1035

Cite

Cite

APA   Click to copy
Pifer, N. A. (2010). Berghuis v. Smith: Continuing Ambiguity in Fair-Cross-Section Claims. Loy. LAL Rev., 44, 1035.


Chicago/Turabian   Click to copy
Pifer, Natalie A. “Berghuis v. Smith: Continuing Ambiguity in Fair-Cross-Section Claims.” Loy. LAL Rev. 44 (2010): 1035.


MLA   Click to copy
Pifer, Natalie A. “Berghuis v. Smith: Continuing Ambiguity in Fair-Cross-Section Claims.” Loy. LAL Rev., vol. 44, HeinOnline, 2010, p. 1035.


BibTeX   Click to copy

@article{pifer2010a,
  title = {Berghuis v. Smith: Continuing Ambiguity in Fair-Cross-Section Claims},
  year = {2010},
  journal = {Loy. LAL Rev.},
  pages = {1035},
  publisher = {HeinOnline},
  volume = {44},
  author = {Pifer, Natalie A}
}


Share



Follow this website


You need to create an Owlstown account to follow this website.


Sign up

Already an Owlstown member?

Log in